Ita/271/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-6, New Delhi v. National Buildings Construction Corporation
High Court
09 May 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Ita/271/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-6, New Delhi v. National Buildings Construction Corporation
Date of order
09 May 2017
Assessment year(s)
2008-2009
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/271/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-6, New Delhi v. National Buildings Construction Corporation, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: 1238/Del/2014 for the Assessment Year 2008-2009 is whether the ITAT erred in deleting the disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules, 1962.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~1
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 271/2017PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6, NEW DELHI
..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Asheesh Jain, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Vikrant A. Maheshwari, Advocate
versus
NATIONAL BUILDINGS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
LTD.
..... Respondent
Through: Ms. Monika Ghai & Ms. Shyamalima
Borah, Advocates
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR O R D E R% 09.05.2017
1. The question urged by the Revenue in this appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’) against the order dated 2[nd] September, 2016 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘ITAT’) in ITA No. 1238/Del/2014 for the Assessment Year 2008-2009 is whether the ITAT erred in deleting the disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. The ITAT has noted that the Assessing Officer did not actually examine whether the deduction claimed by the Assessee was bonafide. The determination by the ITAT has turned purely on facts. No substantial question of law arises.
2. The appeal is dismissed.
S.MURALIDHAR, J
MAY 09, 2017/tp
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.