Ita/278/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Health Care Global Enterprises Ltd
High Court
21 Sep 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/278/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Health Care Global Enterprises Ltd
Date of order
21 Sep 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/278/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Health Care Global Enterprises Ltd, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21 DAY OF SKHPTRBMBER 2016
PRESENT
THR HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL
AND
THR HON’BLE MR.JUSTICK ARAVIND KUMAR|
ITA NO.278/2013
BETWEEN:
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,C R BUILDING,QUEENS ROAD,BANGALORE.
2. THRE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCIRCLE-»9 (1),C R BUILDING,QUEENS ROAD,BANGALORE.
— APPBRBLLANTS|.
(BY SRILK.V.ARAVIND, ADV. FOR|oRI.G.KAMALADHAR, ADV.)
AND:
M/S HEALTH CARE GLOBAL ENTERPRISES LTD., NO.8, HCG TOWER,P KALINGA RAO ROAD,
SAMPANGIRAMANAGAR, BANGALORE — 560 O10.
.. RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.A.SHANKAR & SRI.M.LAVA, ADVOCATES)
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SEC.260-A OF I.T. ACT,1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 18/01/2013)PASSEDIN|TTA.NO.451/BANG/2012,FOR,THBRASSKSSMENTYKBAR2008-2009, PRAYINGTO|FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW|STATKD THRRBIN AND ALLOW THR APPBAL AND SKEEASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ITAT, BANGALORE|IN|ITANO.451/BANG/2012DATHKD18/01/2013|CONFIRMING|THBRORDEROF|THRAPPELLATECOMMISSIONBR AND CONFIRM THR ORDER PASSED|BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,|CIRCLE-95(1), BANGALORE.
THIS APPKBAL COMING ON FOR HBARING THISDAY,JAYANT PATEL J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMBNT
When the matter is taken up for hearing, thelearned counsel appearing for the Revenue states thatas per the Circular dated 10.12.2015 issued by theCentral Board of Direct Taxes (‘CBDT” for short), as themonetary limit for pursuing the appeal is raised fromRs.10,00,000/- (Ten Lakhs) to Rs.20,00,000/- (Twenty
lakhs) for the High Court litigation and same wouldapply to all pending matters and as the subject matterof the present appeal is not exceeding Rs.20 lakhs, hedoes not press the present appeal. |
Hence, the appeal shall stand disposed of as notpressed.
ok/-
Sd/-.JUDGE|Sd/-.JUDGE|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue