Ita/280/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Cochin v. M/S. Kothamangalam Wines, Thodupuzha
High Court
06 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/280/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Cochin v. M/S. Kothamangalam Wines, Thodupuzha
Date of order
06 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/280/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Cochin v. M/S. Kothamangalam Wines, Thodupuzha, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Since the issueinvolved is the same we dismiss this appeal also following ourjudgment in the connected case.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM
MONDAY, THE 6TH JULY 2009 / 15TH ASHADHA 1931
ITA.No. 280 of 2009()
---------------------
ITA.535/1998 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT(S): APPELLANT:
------------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
COCHIN.
BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT:
---------------
M/S.KOTHAMANGALAM WINES,
C/O.M.T.AUGUSTINE, MALAKKAL HOUSE,
KUDYATHOOR P.O., THODUPUZHA.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 06/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. -----------------------------------
I.T.A. No. 280 of 2009
--------------------------------------
Dated this the 6[th] day of July, 2009
J U D G M E N T----------------------
Ramachandran Nair,J.
The connected appeal against the same assessee wasdismissed by judgment in ITA.No.165/2009. Since the issueinvolved is the same we dismiss this appeal also following ourjudgment in the connected case.
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE.
C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE.
okb
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue