Ita/28/1999 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Hindustan Lever Ltd
High Court
16 Aug 2005 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Ita/28/1999 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Hindustan Lever Ltd
Date of order
16 Aug 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/28/1999 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Hindustan Lever Ltd, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Under these circumstances for want of appearance, we have no option but to dismiss the application in default.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.28 OF 1999
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.28 OF 1999
The Commissioner of Income-tax, ..Applicant.
V/s.
Hindustan Lever Ltd. ..Respondent.
None for applicant.
Mr.P.J.Pardiwalla i/b. Matubhai Jamietram for
respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA AND
CORAM : V.C. DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 16TH AUGUST, 2005.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 16TH AUGUST, 2005.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
None of the counsel on the panel of the
revenue, who are present in the Court, are prepared to
appear in this matter. On being asked, each of them
made a statement that they have not been briefed.
Under these circumstances for want of appearance, we
have no option but to dismiss the application in
default.
Application is thus dismissed in default
with no order as to costs.
(V.C. DAGA, J.)
(V.C. DAGA, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.