Case Law › High Court › Ita/28/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Incom...

Ita/28/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Asok T.s

High Court 18 Sep 2018 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · highcourtofkerala

Parties

Date of order

18 Sep 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/28/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Asok T.s, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: ThelearnedStandingCounselfortheappellant/Revenue seeks permission to withdraw theseIncome Tax Appeals based on the litigation policy.Hence, these Income Tax Appeals are dismissed aswithdrawn leaving open the substantial questions oflaw framed in the memorandum of appeals.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON TUESDAY ,THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2018 / 27TH BHADRA, 1940 ITA.No. 28 of 2011 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 798/COCH/2008 ofI.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH DATED 02-07-2010 APPELLANT/S:/APPELLANT/REVENUE THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI PKR MENON, SR COUNSEL FOR GOI (TAXES)SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX DEPT. RESPONDENT/S:/RESPONDENT/ASSESSEE ASHOK T.SAPARNA, PTO JUNCTION, MARAPPALAM, PATTOM P.O.,, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 004. BY ADVS.SRI.E.K.NANDAKUMAR (SR.)SMT.PREETHA S.NAIRSRI.K.JOHN MATHAISRI.P.BENNY THOMASSRI.P.GOPINATH THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18.09.2018, ALONG WITH ITA.22/2011 AND ITA.49/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAYDELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ITA Nos.22, 28 & 49 of 2011 -2- ITA Nos.22, 28 & 49 of 2011 JUDGMENT K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J. ThelearnedStandingCounselfortheappellant/Revenue seeks permission to withdraw theseIncome Tax Appeals based on the litigation policy.Hence, these Income Tax Appeals are dismissed aswithdrawn leaving open the substantial questions oflaw framed in the memorandum of appeals. Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN JUDGE 18/09/18jg Sd/- ASHOK MENON JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.