Ita/28/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Ashok Goyal
High Court
18 Aug 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_jbp
Parties
Ita/28/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Ashok Goyal
Date of order
18 Aug 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/28/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Ashok Goyal, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: On the strength of said letter, learned counsel for the Revenue prays forwithdrawal of this appeal which accordingly stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT JABALPURBEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU
&
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMAR NATH (KESHARWANI)ON THE 18[th] OF AUGUST, 2023
INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 28 of 2014
BETWEEN:-
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BHOPAL (MADHYAPRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
(BY SHRI SIDDHARTH SHARMA - JUNIOR STANDING COUNSEL)
AND
SHRI ASHOK GOYAL, 18, SHYAMALA HILLS, BHOPAL(MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SHRI ABHIJEET SHRIVASTAVA - ADVOCATE)
.....RESPONDENT
This appeal coming on for admission this day, JUSTICE SHEEL
NAGU passed the following:
ORDER
Learned junior standing counsel for the Income Tax Department ShriSharma has brought to the notice of this Court a letter dated 27.07.2023 of thePrincipal Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Bhopal, revealing the intent of theRevenue to withdraw the present appeal.
The Registry is directed to keep the letter dated 27.07.2023 on record.
On the strength of said letter, learned counsel for the Revenue prays forwithdrawal of this appeal which accordingly stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(SHEEL NAGU)JUDGE
Priya.P
(AMAR NATH (KESHARWANI))JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue