Case LawHigh Court › Ita/282/2011 Of M/S Ankita Electronics P...

Ita/282/2011 Of M/S Ankita Electronics Pvt Ltd v. The Assistant Commissoner Of Income Tax

High Court 19 Jan 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/282/2011 Of M/S Ankita Electronics Pvt Ltd v. The Assistant Commissoner Of Income Tax
Date of order
19 Jan 2021
Assessment year(s)
2001-02
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Ita/282/2011 Of M/S Ankita Electronics Pvt Ltd v. The Assistant Commissoner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19[TH|]DAY OF JANUARY 2071 PRESENT| THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND| THE HON’‘’BLE MR. JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASW A BETWEEN: 1LT.A. NO.2Z82 OF 201 M/S. ANKITA ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD.,# 74, ANKITA HOUSE, MOUNT JOY ROAD|HANUMAN THNAGARBANGALORE-560019 (REP. BY ITS DIRECTORSRI. NALIN R. PATEL.AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS|S/O SRI. RAMANBHAI MOTHIBHAI PATEL). (BY MR. SHARATH S.A. ADV., FOR)MR. CHYTHANYA K.K. ADV.,) .... APPELLAN/ AND" THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-11(1), BANGALORE. .., RESPONDENT (BY MR. DILIP KUMAR, ADV., FORMR. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.,) | THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SEC. J6O0-A OF INCOME TAXACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 18.03.2011 PASSEDIN ITA NO.996/BANG/2010 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2001-02,PRAYING TQ: | (i) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW.STATED THEREIN.» (ii) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED.18.03.2011 PASSED BY THE ITAT, BANGALORE ‘A’ BENCH IN ITA.NO.996/BANG/2010 IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.| THIS I.7T.A. COMING ON FOR’ HEARING, THIS’ DAY, |ALOK ARADHE J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: | JUDGMENT Mr.Sharath S., learned counsel for Mr.chythanya K.K.,_learned counsel for the assessee. Mr.Dilip Kumar, learned counsel for Mr.K.V.Aravind,|learned counsel for the revenue. Learned counsel for the assessee has filed a memo'seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal. Theaforesaid memo is taken on record. 2. For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal is aismissed as withdrawn. Sd/-JUDGE Sd/-—JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan