Ita/282/2011 Of M/S Ankita Electronics Pvt Ltd v. The Assistant Commissoner Of Income Tax
High Court
19 Jan 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/282/2011 Of M/S Ankita Electronics Pvt Ltd v. The Assistant Commissoner Of Income Tax
Date of order
19 Jan 2021
Assessment year(s)
2001-02
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/282/2011 Of M/S Ankita Electronics Pvt Ltd v. The Assistant Commissoner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19[TH|]DAY OF JANUARY 2071
PRESENT|
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND|
THE HON’‘’BLE MR. JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASW A
BETWEEN:
1LT.A. NO.2Z82 OF 201
M/S. ANKITA ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD.,# 74, ANKITA HOUSE, MOUNT JOY ROAD|HANUMAN THNAGARBANGALORE-560019 (REP. BY ITS DIRECTORSRI. NALIN R. PATEL.AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS|S/O SRI. RAMANBHAI MOTHIBHAI PATEL).
(BY MR. SHARATH S.A. ADV., FOR)MR. CHYTHANYA K.K. ADV.,)
.... APPELLAN/
AND"
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
CIRCLE-11(1), BANGALORE.
.., RESPONDENT
(BY MR. DILIP KUMAR, ADV., FORMR. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.,) |
THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SEC. J6O0-A OF INCOME TAXACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 18.03.2011 PASSEDIN ITA NO.996/BANG/2010 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2001-02,PRAYING TQ: |
(i) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW.STATED THEREIN.»
(ii) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED.18.03.2011 PASSED BY THE ITAT, BANGALORE ‘A’ BENCH IN ITA.NO.996/BANG/2010 IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.|
THIS I.7T.A. COMING ON FOR’ HEARING, THIS’ DAY, |ALOK ARADHE J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: |
JUDGMENT
Mr.Sharath S., learned counsel for Mr.chythanya K.K.,_learned counsel for the assessee.
Mr.Dilip Kumar, learned counsel for Mr.K.V.Aravind,|learned counsel for the revenue.
Learned counsel for the assessee has filed a memo'seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal. Theaforesaid memo is taken on record.
2. For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal is
aismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-JUDGE
Sd/-—JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.