Case LawHigh Court › Ita/284/2018 Of Analjit Singh v. Princip...

Ita/284/2018 Of Analjit Singh v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-6

High Court 12 Mar 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Ita/284/2018 Of Analjit Singh v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-6
Date of order
12 Mar 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/284/2018 Of Analjit Singh v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-6, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn along with the pending application.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 284/2018, C.M. APPL.9213/2018 ANALJIT SINGH ..... Appellant Through : Sh. Deepak Chopra, Sh. Rohan Khare and Sh. Sheel Vardhan, Advocates. versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6... Respondent Through : Sh. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA O R D E R % 12.03.2018 It is submitted on behalf of the appellant that a rectification –application for correction of the errors said to be apparent on the –face of the record in regard to the application of Rule 11UA of the Income Tax Rules has been made and is pending. The appellant had approached this Court by filing W.P.(C) 1978/2018, seeking relief on the ground that the rectification proceedings had been concluded upon hearing but no orders were made, though reserved. The Court granted time to the appellant to approach this Court through an appeal. The consistent view of this High Court in such matters is that the appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereafter “the Act”] should not be resorted to as it would lead to multifariousness. In the circumstances and in consonance with the Page 1 of 2 consistent practice and rules based on various precedents, the Court is of the opinion that the appellant should first exhaust its other remedies. Since the Tribunal has reserved orders on 30.01.2018, it is directed to pronounce orders within three weeks from today. Having regard to the orders dated 28.02.2018, [in W.P.(C) 1978/2018] and the further circumstance that the appellant has furnished security in terms of the Tribunal’s previous orders and also deposited `8 crores pursuant to this Court’s order, the status quobetween the parties shall be maintained till final orders are made in the rectification proceedings. The status quo shall be maintained for four weeks between the parties. It is open to the appellant to urge all grounds, including the grounds sought to be substantially urged in the present appeal in the event of adverse orders in the rectification proceedings. All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved. The appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn along with the pending application. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J MARCH 12, 2018 A. K. CHAWLA, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan