Ita/285/2021 Of Rashtreeya Sikshana Samithi Trust v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
05 Jun 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/285/2021 Of Rashtreeya Sikshana Samithi Trust v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
05 Jun 2023
Assessment year(s)
2012-13
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/285/2021 Of Rashtreeya Sikshana Samithi Trust v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: This appeal is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Digitally signedby ANUSHA VLocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5 DAY OF JUNE, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 285 OF 2021
BETWEEN:
RASHTREEYA SIKSHANA SAMITHI TRUST RV TEACHERS COLLEGE BUILDING 2 BLOCK, JAYANAGAR BENGALURU-560 011. REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS HON. SECRETARY MR. A.V.S. MURTHY PAN: …APPELLANT
(BY SHRI. VIKRAM HUILGOL, SENIOR ADVOCATE A/W SHRI. SANDEEP HUILGOL, ADVOCATE) SHRI. SANDEEP HUILGOL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTIONS RANGE BANGALORE 3 FLOOR, CR BUILDING No.1, QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE-560 001. 2. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX EXEMPTIONS RANGE BANGALORE CR BUILDING No.1, QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE-560 001. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI. E.I. SANMATHI, STANDING COUNSEL)
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 06.04.2018 PASSED IN ITA NO.1732/BANG/2017, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13, PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN AND ETC.,
THIS ITA, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, P.S.DINESH KUMAR, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Shri Vikram Huilgol, learned Senior Advocate for the appellant submits that in view of the dismissal of connected ITA No.554/2018 today, this appeal is rendered infructuous. His submission is placed on record.
2. This appeal is accordingly dismissed as having
become infructuous.
No costs.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.