Ita/287/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.kreem Drinks Pvt.ltd
High Court
04 Oct 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/287/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.kreem Drinks Pvt.ltd
Date of order
04 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/287/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.kreem Drinks Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON
THURSDAY ,THE 04TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2018 / 12TH ASWINA, 1940
ITA.No. 287 of 2014
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 76/2014 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHINBENCH DATED 25-04-2014
APPELLANT/S:
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXKOTTAYAM.
BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, GOI (TAXES)
RESPONDENT/S:
M/S.KREEM DRINKS PVT.LTD.XXVIII/3030, CHERUPARAMBATHU ROAD, KADVANTHRA, KOCHI - 682 020.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.BENNY THOMASSRI.JOSON MANAVALANSRI.K.JOHN MATHAISRI.KURYAN THOMASSRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIARSRI.P.GOPINATH
OTHER PRESENT:
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04.10.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Vinod Chandran, J.
The learned Standing Counsel, Government of India(Taxes) submits, on instructions, that the Revenue may bepermitted to withdraw the appeal on the basis of thelitigation policy framed by the Central Board of DirectTaxes. Hence, the appeal is permitted to be withdrawn,leaving open the questions of law.
Sd/-
K.VINOD CHANDRANJUDGE
Sd/-ASHOK MENONJUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.