Case LawHigh Court › Ita/291/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/291/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. M/S.appollo Tyres Ltd

High Court 30 Jul 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/291/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. M/S.appollo Tyres Ltd
Date of order
30 Jul 2021
Assessment year(s)
2006-07
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/291/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. M/S.appollo Tyres Ltd, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Referring to the Supreme Court judgment and the latestcircular, we are of the view that the appeal is not maintainable,hence is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMASFRIDAY, THE 30 DAY OF JULY 2021 / 8TH SRAVANA, 1943 ITA NO. 291 OF 2013 AGAINST THE ORDER IN ITA 31/2010 OF I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH,ERNAKULAM APPELLANT/S: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1COCHIN. BY ADVS.SRI.P.K.RAVINDRANATHA MENON (SR.)JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAXCHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT RESPONDENT/S: M/S.APPOLLO TYRES LTD6TH FLOOR, CHERUPUZHPAM BUILDINGS, SHANMUGHAM ROAD, COCHIN-31. BY SR.ADV.JOSEPH MARKOS THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING ON 30.07.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J U D G M E N T S.V.Bhatti, J. Heard learned Standing Counsel Mr. Christopher Abraham and learned Senior Counsel Mr. Joseph Markos for parties. 2.The Commissioner of Income Tax/Revenue is the appellant. M/s.Apollo Tyres Ltd., Kochi/Assessee is therespondent. The subject appeal is at the instance of Revenuefrom the order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short ‘theTribunal'), Cochin Bench in ITA No.31/Coch/2010 dated29.05.2013. The appeal deals with the Assessment Year 2006-07. 3. The value in the appeal is less than the limitprescribed by CBDT Circular. The Supreme Court in thejudgment reported in S.C.Naregal v Commissioner of Income Tax[1] has considered the effect of CBDT Circular and dismissed the I.T.A. No.291/2013 appeal coming within the purport of CBDT Circular. 4. The valuation of the subject appeal since is less than the limit stipulated by CBDT Circular, the judgment of ApexCourt in S.C.Naregal (supra) is applicable to the appeal. Referring to the Supreme Court judgment and the latestcircular, we are of the view that the appeal is not maintainable,hence is dismissed. Sd/- S.V.BHATTIJUDGE Sd/- BECHU KURIAN THOMASJUDGE I.T.A. No.291/2013 PETITIONER ANNEXURE ANNEXURE A ANNEXURE B ANNEXURE C APPENDIX OF ITA 291/2013 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER U/S 143(3) DATED 19.12.2008 FOR THE ASST.YEAR 2006-2007 COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 30.11.2009 OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS-11) COCHIN. COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 29.5.2013 OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, COCHIN BENCH ITA NO 31/COCH/2010
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan