Case LawHigh Court › Ita/29/2001 Of The Commissioner Of Incom...

Ita/29/2001 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai-I v. Indian Express Newspapers (Bom) Pvt Ltd

High Court 21 Nov 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Ita/29/2001 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai-I v. Indian Express Newspapers (Bom) Pvt Ltd
Date of order
21 Nov 2005
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Ita/29/2001 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai-I v. Indian Express Newspapers (Bom) Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.

Issue: As against that the issue which is sought to be raised is concerning the higher charges for the machinery and whether the same should be treated as income from other sources.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Income Tax Application No.29 of 2001 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai City I. .. .. Applicant v/s. Indian Express Newspapers (Bom) Pvt. Ltd. .. Respondent Mr.Parag Vyas for applicant. Mr.P.J.Pardiwalla with Mr.Vinayak Shety i/by Poorvi Kamani for respondent. ----- CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 21st November 2005 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard Mr.Vyas for the applicant. Mr.Pardiwalla appears for the respondent. 2. Mr.Pardiwalla has drawn our attention to the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal wherefrom the present Application is filed. The issue before the Tribunal was with respect to disallowance of damages for delayed payment of provident fund and contribution to E.S.I. As against that the issue which is sought to be raised is concerning the higher charges for the machinery and whether the same should be treated as income from other sources. It is a complete non-application of mind in filing the Application inasmuch as the issue sought to be -2- raised does not arise at all. Application is rejected. (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan