Ita/29/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Hotel Navarathna Complex
High Court
18 Nov 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/29/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Hotel Navarathna Complex
Date of order
18 Nov 2014
Assessment year(s)
2004-2005
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/29/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Hotel Navarathna Complex, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 18 DAY OF NOVEMBER 2014
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N. KUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR_.JUSTICE B.MANOHARL.T.A. No.29/2010
BETWEEN:
1. The Commissioner of Income-Tax,C.R.Building, Attavara,Mangalore.
2. The Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax,Central Circle, C.R.Building,Attavara, Mangalore.APPELLANTS
(By Sri.K.V.Aravind, Adv.)
AND"
M/s.Hotel Navarathna Complex, K.S.Rao Road,Mangalore.
RESPONDENT
(By Sri.A.Shankar & Sri.M.Lava, Advs.)
7K OK
This ITA is filed under section 260-A of I.T.Act, 1961,|arising out of order dated 28.8.2009 passed in ITA.No.415/|
Bang/2009, for the Assessment Year 2004-2005, praying toformulate the substantial questions of law stated therein andaliow the appeal and set aside the order passed by tne ITAT,Bangalore, in ITA No.415/Bang/2009 at.28.8.2009 and confirmthe order passed by the Dy.Commissioner of Income Tax, Circie-2(1), Mangalore.
This ITA coming on for Orders this day,N.KUMAR, J.,delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
This appeal is preferred by the revenue challenging theorder passed by the Tribunal granting relief to the assessee.
2).The net tax which is the subject matter of this appealIS<9,30,418/-. In view of the Instruction No.3/2011 which isheld to be retrospective in nature by this Court in the case ofCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANOTHER vs, RANKA &
reported in|(2012) 72 DTR (Kar.) 270, tnis appeal isnot maintainable. |
‘3.However, it is submitted that the revenue haschalienged the said judgment in the Hon'ble Apex Court and the
matter is under consideration. In the event of revenuesucceeding before the Hon'ble Apex Court, liberty is reserved tothem to seek revival of this appeal. At this stage, the appeal isdismissed as not maintainable on the ground of monetary limit.
Sri.A.Shankar, learned counsel, is permitted to filevakalatn witnin four weeks.|
Bss.
Sd/-.
JUDGE.
Sd/-|
JUDGE.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.