Case LawHigh Court › Ita/295/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/295/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Margasoochi Chits Pvt Ltd

High Court 12 Dec 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/295/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Margasoochi Chits Pvt Ltd
Date of order
12 Dec 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/295/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Margasoochi Chits Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THER 1[th]DAY OF DECEMBER, 2014 PRESENT THR HON' BLE MR. JUSTICK N.KUMAR ANT) THR HON' BLE MR. JUSTICK B. MANOHAR INCOME TAX APPEAL No.295/2009 BBRTWEHR 1. THR COMMISSIONBR OF [INCOME-TAX.C R BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE. 2. THRH INCOME TAX OFFICKR.WARD-16(2)C R BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD|BANGALORE_. APPBELLANTS (BY SRI K V ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) AND: M/S MARGASOOCHI CHITS PVT.LTDNO.912/2, 18 ‘A’ MAIN|RAJAJINAGAR, 3 BLOCK,BANGALORE — 560010. _. RESPONDENT. (BY SRI A SHANKAR & M LAVA, ADVS.) THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF|L.T.ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 16.01.2009PASSEDIN-ITA|NO.995/BNG/2008,FORTHBKASSESSMENT YBAR 2005-06 PRAYING TO FORMULATETHE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREINAND ALLOW THR APPBAL AND SKHKT ASIDE THR ORDEPASSED.BY|THERITAT|BANGALORE,IN|ITA| 2 NO.995/BNG/2008, DATED 16.01.2009 CONFIRMING THE|ORDEROF|THEAPPELLATECOMMISSION BRAN)CONFIRM THR ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX|OFFICER, WARD-16(2), BANGALORE IN THE INTEREST OF|JUSTICE AND EQUITY. This Income Tax Appeal coming on for Hearingthis day, N. Kumar J., delivered the following: JUDGMENT The net tax effect in this appeal 1S | Rs. 2,81,888/-. In view of Circular No.2/2005 prescribing the monitory limit of Rs.4 lakhs, thisappeal is not maintainable. Accordingly, it isdismissed on the ground of monitory limit withoutsoing into the merits. od/-Judge sd/- Judge Nsu/-_
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan