Ita/295/2010 Of Shree Gangadhareshwara Educational Trust v. The Director Of Income Tax (Exemptions)
High Court
14 Nov 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/295/2010 Of Shree Gangadhareshwara Educational Trust v. The Director Of Income Tax (Exemptions)
Date of order
14 Nov 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/295/2010 Of Shree Gangadhareshwara Educational Trust v. The Director Of Income Tax (Exemptions), the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU|ON THE 14 DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2018
BEFORE
THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH|
AND|
THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE K. NATARAJAN.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.295 OF 2010
BEI|WEEN:
SHREE GANGADHARESHWARAEDUCATIONAL TRUST,REPRESENTED BY ITS TRUSTEE,DHANANJAYA G.,No.214, MAGADI MAIN ROAD,SUNKADAKATTE,BANGALORE.
— APPELLANT
(BY SRI A. SHANKAR & SRI M, LAVA, ADVOCATES)
AND:
THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS)|C.R. BUILDING,QUEENS ROAD,BANGALORE.
~., RESPONDENT
(BY SRI K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL [IS FILED UNDERSECTION 260-A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961,|PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL|IN I.7.A. NO.1175/BANG/2009, DATED 31-3-2010)VIDE ANNEXURE-A, AND ETC.
THIS INCOME TAK APPEAL COMING ON FORHEARING, THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH, J., DELIVERED|THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that inview of the subsequent order passed by this Court in|I.T.A. No.296 of 2010 along with I.T.A. No.38 of 2012,|this appeal has become infructuous, since the relief has|been granted in the aforesaid order.
In view of the submission made, the appealstands disposed off.
SD/-|JUDGE|
kKVK
SD/- |JUDGE|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.