Case Law › High Court › Ita/295/2013 Of Shri.arun Thomas v. The...

Ita/295/2013 Of Shri.arun Thomas v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 11 Jan 2017 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · highcourtofkerala

Parties

Date of order

11 Jan 2017

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Ita/295/2013 Of Shri.arun Thomas v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC& THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 2017/21ST POUSHA, 1938 ITA.No. 295 of 2013-------------------AGAINST THE ORDER IN ITA 116/2012 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCHDATED 28-06-2013 APPELLANT/ ASSESSEE:------------------- SHRI.ARUN THOMAS, M/S KANNATTU ARUN FINANCERS, M.C ROAD, CHENGANNUR 689 121. BY ADVS.SRI.T.M.SREEDHARAN (SR.) SRI.V.P.NARAYANAN SMT.BOBY M.SEKHAR SMT.DIVYA RAVINDRAN RESPONDENT/ REVENUE:-------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PUBLIC LIBRARY BUILDING, SHASTRI ROAD, KOTTAYAM 686 001 R BY SRI.P.K.R.MENON, SC, FOR INCOME TAX THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON11-01-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC & DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I.T.A.No.295 of 2013 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 11[th] day of January, 2017 JUDGMENT Antony Dominic, J. In view of the subsequent orders passed, this appeal has becomeinfructuous. Accordingly, this appeal is closed as infructuous. SD/- ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jes SD/- DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.