Ita/298/2022 Of Sri Kempaiah Vinay v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
04 Feb 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/298/2022 Of Sri Kempaiah Vinay v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
04 Feb 2025
Assessment year(s)
2014-2015, 2014-15
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/298/2022 Of Sri Kempaiah Vinay v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In view of the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as sought for.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
Digitally signed byMOUNESHWARAPPANAGARATHNALocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA
NC: 2025:KHC:4979-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 4 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.298 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
SRI KEMPAIAH VINAY AGED 43 YEARS SON OF SRI MAYANNA KEMPAIAH NO.67, GELEYARA BALAGA COLONY MAHALAKSHMIPURAM BENGALURU-560 086.
…APPELLANT
(BY MS. PRATHIBHA, ADVOCATE, FOR SRI S. PARTHASARATHI)
AND:
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 6(2)(1) ROOM NO.317, 3 FLOOR BMTC BUILDING, KORAMANGALA BENGALURU-560 095.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI M. DILIP AND SRI Y.V. RAVIRAJ, ADVOCATE)
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 04-08-2021 AND 06-01-2022 PASSED IN ITA NO.410/BANG/2020 AND MP NO.95/BANG/2021 (IN ITA NO.410/BANG/2020) RESPECTIVELY FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-2015.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR)
Ms. Prathibha, representing Sri. S. Parthasarathi., learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Sri. M. Dilip., and Sri. Raviraj. Y.V., learned counsel appearing for the respondent are present before the Court physically.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo dated 24.01.2025, seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the appeal. The said memo reads as under :
"The Appellant most humbly submits as under:
The above Appellant's appeal in ITA No.298/2022 for the assessment year 2014-15 filed under Section 260A of the IT Act, 1961 is pending before the Hon'ble High Court. The Appellant herein opted for settlement of tax under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and accordingly filed application before the Designated Authority and the Designated Authority has issued certificate under sub section (1) of section 92 of the Finance (No. 2) Act 2024 under the Direct tax Vivad se vishwas scheme 2024 in Form 2 - The
Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Rules, 2024 circular No.19/2024 on 16.12.2024.
In the circumstances, the Appellant herein prays that the Hon'ble Court be pleased to dispose of the above appeal as withdrawn by the Appellant and grant liberty."
3. The said memo is taken on record.
4. In view of the memo, the appeal is dismissed as
withdrawn with the liberty as sought for.
Sd/-
(K.SOMASHEKAR) JUDGE
Sd/- (VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE
PHM
List No.: 3 Sl No.: 3
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.