Ita/30/2001 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai-I v. Indian Express Newspaper (Bom) P.ltd
High Court
21 Nov 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Ita/30/2001 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai-I v. Indian Express Newspaper (Bom) P.ltd
Date of order
21 Nov 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/30/2001 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai-I v. Indian Express Newspaper (Bom) P.ltd, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
Income Tax Application No.30 of 2001
The Commissioner of Income Tax,
Mumbai City-I. .. .. Applicant
v/s.
Indian Express Newspapers (Bom)
Pvt. Ltd. .. .. Respondent
Mr.Parag Vyas for applicant.
Mr.P.J.Pardiwalla with Mr.Vinayak i/by Poorvi
Kamani for respondent.
-----
CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 21st November 2005
P.C. :
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.
2. The decision rendered by the Tribunal has
been accepted by the revenue. That being so,
there is no occasion to file the present
Application and to raise the kind of issue which
is sought to be raised. Application is rejected.
(H.L. GOKHALE, J.)
(H.L. GOKHALE, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue