Ita/308/2016 Of Director Of Income Tax v. M/S Printech Park Cluster
High Court
10 Feb 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/308/2016 Of Director Of Income Tax v. M/S Printech Park Cluster
Date of order
10 Feb 2021
Assessment year(s)
2014-2015
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/308/2016 Of Director Of Income Tax v. M/S Printech Park Cluster, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: In the result, the appeal is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASWAMY
I.T.A. NO.308 OF 2016
BETWEEN:
DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), C.R. BUILDINGS, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. T.N.C.SRIDHAR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. E.I.SANMATHI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
M/S PRINTECH PARK CLUSTER, NO.84/1, KSPA-XIL PTTC, 6 CROSS, 4 MAIN, CHAMRAJPET, BANGALORE-560018.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. K.KIRAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 07.10.2015 PASSED IN ITA NO.1386/Bang/2014, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-2015 PRAYING TO (1) DECIDE THE
FOREGOING QUESTION OF LAW AND/OR SUCH OTHER QUESTIONS OF LAW AS MAY BE FORMULATED BY THE HON’BLE COURT AS DEEMED FIT (2) TO SET ASIDE THE APPELLATE ORDER DATED 07.10.2015 PASSED BY THE ITAT, ‘C’ BENCH, BENGALURU, AS SOUGHT FOR, IN THE RESPONDENT-ASSESSEE’S CASE, IN APPEAL PROCEEDINGS NO.ITA NO.1386/Bang/2014 AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Mr.T.N.C.Sridhar for Mr.E.I.Sanmathi, learned counsel for the revenue.
Mr. K.Kiran Kumar, learned counsel for the assessee.
Learned counsel for the revenue has produced a memo in which it is stated that the assessee during the pendency of this appeal has filed an application on 21.12.2020 seeking registration under Section 12(A)(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It is therefore, submitted that the substantial questions of law involved in this appeal have been rendered academic. It is therefore, not necessary to answer the same.
The memo is taken on record. In the result, the appeal is disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE
GH
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.