Case LawHigh Court › Ita/31/2012 Of M/S Karnataka Kshatriya M...

Ita/31/2012 Of M/S Karnataka Kshatriya Maratha Parishath v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income-Tax

High Court 15 Mar 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/31/2012 Of M/S Karnataka Kshatriya Maratha Parishath v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
15 Mar 2021
Assessment year(s)
2005-2006
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/31/2012 Of M/S Karnataka Kshatriya Maratha Parishath v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to revive the same, if occasion so arises.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15 DAY OF MARCH 2021 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI I. T. A. NO.31 OF 2012 BETWEEN: M/S KARNATAKA KSHATRIYA MARATHA PARISHATH SRI AMBABHAVANI KALYANA MANDIRA, AGRAHARA ROAD HASSAN-573 201 REPREENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT SRI. N LEELA KUMAR AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS SON OF SRI. N BHEEMA RAO … APPELLANT (BY SRI. JINITA CHATTARJEE, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. S PARTHASARATHI, ADVOCATE) AND: THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, HASSAN RANGE HASSAN. (BY SRI. DILIP KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. K V ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) … RESPONDENT THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T.ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 14.10.2011 PASSED IN ITA No.139/BANG/2011, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2005-2006, PRAYING TO i) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN, ii) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE ITAT DATED 14.10.2011 PASSED BY THE ITAT IN ITA No.139/BANG/2011, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS ITA COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: DAY, JUDGMENT Ms. Jinita Chatterjee, learned counsel for Mr. S.Parthasarathi, learned counsel for the assessee. Mr. Dilip Kumar, learned counsel for Mr. K.V.Aravind, learned counsel for the Revenue. 2. Learned counsel for the assessee has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal. 3. Aforesaid memo is taken on record. For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to revive the same, if occasion so arises. SD/- JUDGESD/- JUDGE RD
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan