Ita/313/2023 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income- Tax v. M/S Trianz Holdings Pvt. Ltd
High Court
19 Aug 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/313/2023 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income- Tax v. M/S Trianz Holdings Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
19 Aug 2024
Assessment year(s)
2015-2016
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/313/2023 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income- Tax v. M/S Trianz Holdings Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether the Tribunal was right in fact and in law in holding that where the assessee did not have exempt income, no disallowance could be made under Section 14A r.w.r 8D when the issue has not yet reached finality and matter is pending before the Apex Court.” 4.
Decision: The appeal stands dismissed and the substantial question of law is answered in favour of Assessee against the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
Digitally signedby BHARATHISLocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19 DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 313 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
1. THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME- TAX 5 FLOOR BMTC BUILDING 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA BENGALURU – 560 095.
2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 7(1)(1), 2 FLOOR BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD KORAMANGALA BENGALURU – 560 095.
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI SUSHAL TIWARI N, ADVOCATE)
AND:
M/s. TRIANZ HOLDINGS PVT. LTD., No.165/2, 6 FLOOR KALYANI MAGNUM DORAISANNIPALYA, IIM POST BENNERGHATTA ROAD BENGALURU – 560 076. PAN: AAFCA 8051P.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI TANMAYEE RAJKUMAR, ADVOCATE)
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE AND ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN IT(TP)A No.2639/BANG/2019 DATED 16.11.2021 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-2016 ANNEXURE-D AND
CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE DRP CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 7(1)(1), BENGALURU AND ETC.,
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FURTHER ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT)
1. Heard Sri Sushal Tiwari N., learned counsel appearing for
the appellants and Smt. Tanmayee Rajkumr, learned counsel appearing for the respondent and perused the appeal papers.
2.With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties, the above appeal is taken up for final disposal.
3.Sri Sushal Tiwari N., learned counsel would submit that the appeal is filed raising the following substantial question of law:
“1. Whether the Tribunal was right in fact and in law in holding that where the assessee did not have exempt income, no disallowance could be made under Section 14A r.w.r 8D when the issue has not yet reached finality and matter is pending before the Apex Court.”
4. Learned counsel for respondent – Assesse would submit that the substantial question of law raised in the present appeal is already answered by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in ITA No.133/2015 disposed of on 15.02.2021.
5. Learned counsel for the appellant-Revenue is not in a position to dispute the same.
6. We have gone through the judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench dated 15.02.2021 in ITA No.133/2015.
7. The substantial question of law raised in the present appeal is squarely covered by the decision referred above. The appeal stands dismissed and the substantial question of law is answered in favour of Assessee against the Revenue.
Sd/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE
Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE
BS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.