Ita/319/2010 Of M/S.olam Exports(India) Ltd v. The Dy.commissioner Of Income Tax Circle
High Court
21 Jan 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/319/2010 Of M/S.olam Exports(India) Ltd v. The Dy.commissioner Of Income Tax Circle
Date of order
21 Jan 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/319/2010 Of M/S.olam Exports(India) Ltd v. The Dy.commissioner Of Income Tax Circle, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID
FRIDAY, THE 21ST JANUARY 2011 / 1ST MAGHA 1932
ITA.No. 319 of 2010()
--------------------------
ITA.247/2007 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN
....................
APPELLANT/APPELLANT
-----------------------------
M/S. OLAM EXPORTS (INDIA) LTD.,
BISHOP JEROME NAGAR, KOLLAM, REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR.
BY ADVS. SRI.SAJI VARGHESE
SRI.R. VIJAYARAGHAVAN
RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT
-------------------------------------
THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
CIRCLE-1, KOLLAM.
BY ADVS. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES)
SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 21/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
svs
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & HARUN-UL-RASHID, JJ.-------------------------------------------------------------
I.T.A.No.319 Of 2010
----------------------
Dated this the 21[st] day of January, 2011.
J U D G M E N T
Ramachandran Nair, J.
During the course of hearing, the learned counsel for theappellant sought permission to withdraw the appeal leaving therights of the appellant to claim benefits based on theobservations of the Tribunal. Permission is granted and wedismiss the appeal as withdrawn.
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,
Judge.
bkn/-
HARUN-UL-RASHID, Judge.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.