Ita/319/2011 Of M/S Oracle India Private Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax
High Court
16 Feb 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/319/2011 Of M/S Oracle India Private Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
16 Feb 2021
Assessment year(s)
2002-2003
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/319/2011 Of M/S Oracle India Private Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In view of the aforesaid submission, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to revive the same if occasion so arises.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASWAMY
I.T.A. NO.319 OF 2011
BETWEEN:
M/S ORACLE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, REP. BY ITS ACCOUNTS AND PAYROLL MANAGER SRI. P. KAVERIAPPA, 6 FLOOR, DIVYASHREE CHAMBERS, LANGFORD ROAD, BANGALORE-560025.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. A.SHANKAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. M. LAVA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BANGALORE-III, C.R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE-560001.
(BY SRI. K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
…RESPONDENT
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 29.03.2011 PASSED IN ITA NO.661/BANG/2007, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2002-2003 PRAYING TO;
(a) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW AS STATED ABOVE AND ANSWER THE SAME IN FAVOUR OF THE APPELLANT;
(b) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE FINDINGS IN THE ORDER PASSED BY THE TRIBUNAL IN ITA NO.661/(BANG)/2007 DATED 29.03.2011;
(c) PASS SUCH OTHER ORDERS, AS THIS HON’BLE COURT DEEMS FIT AND PROPER TO MEET THE ENDS OF JUSTICE.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Mr.K.V.Aravind, learned counsel for the revenue.
Mr.A.Shankar, learned senior counsel for Mr.Lava, learned counsel for the assessee.
Learned senior counsel for the assessee submits that against the order giving effect under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 the assessee has availed all the benefits under ‘Vivid se Vishwas’ scheme and therefore, the learned counsel for the assessee seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal, with liberty to permit him to amend the cause title and to describe the name of the appellant as M/s. Oracle India Private Limited.
2. He is permitted to do so. In view of the aforesaid submission, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to revive the same if occasion so arises.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
GH
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.