Case Law › High Court › Ita/3/2016 Of Satya Narayan Deo v. Princ...

Ita/3/2016 Of Satya Narayan Deo v. Principal Chief Commnr.of Income Tax

High Court 04 Mar 2022 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · cisnc

Parties

Date of order

04 Mar 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/3/2016 Of Satya Narayan Deo v. Principal Chief Commnr.of Income Tax, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Decision: The appeal has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Order No. 03. S. Behera IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ITA No. 3 of 2016 …. Satya Narayan Deo Appellant Mr. J.M. Pattanaik, Advocate -versus- …. Respondents The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Bhubaneswar and others Mr. T.K. Satapathy, Senior Standing Counsel CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R. K. PATTANAIK ORDER04.03.2022 Mr. Pattanaik, learned counsel appearing for the Appellant, states that the Appellant has already availed of the “Vivad se Vishwas Scheme”. The appeal has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (R. K. Pattanaik) Judge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.