Case LawHigh Court › Ita/3204/2005 Of The Commr Of Income Tax...

Ita/3204/2005 Of The Commr Of Income Tax v. M/S Wipro Ltd

High Court 28 Feb 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/3204/2005 Of The Commr Of Income Tax v. M/S Wipro Ltd
Date of order
28 Feb 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/3204/2005 Of The Commr Of Income Tax v. M/S Wipro Ltd, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
C)9—h(‘<—‘rCLC:ccCLCD3<CLCz0CLCDHaCDCL3±:rtIDCL(C)ccHH.9—‘4,,:CL0CL:C)CC.CL-<ccCCH?CDC:?:ci):3.:Lt:3:<,CDCLE(C3C.D::tC.‘<.CD2±C.ESCL:,IA’cccw<3CDC)D):3C,CtCI)CC)CLHcc)C:<CrC))CL-tHCDCLCDCC.rt-)43)f)-ccCiCLCC)HC)C):ciC)U,ICDCC(<‘7:30cc9,C)—4$3(C)HC:cc’:.,,,CL:C)—r0:,rtciCDH<ccCD‘7’0“7HccciCC)CCL°HtrCD)C)37CD.7’?.B.(3:L(i:3)C)?:()CDHI<‘<.::,:7<‘i’CLCD’C)—CDrt::-4(7)C) -UiCD’ci)1)oBfl):CDC)‘C:CL——-CD,C)7;-CL)<HccCDCD7<4CL(3C)w(2)r(3C)iH——7,,)Cr(2’)C)))CrH:“-7(iHrCi.HPr.)$33cc:r0:4CDCL:7CL.rtCD0-9r”P(7)C):C.——‘ciC,“33CDccCL“r-,D_<:Dir’rrtCL,,::C‘h<1’(3r.::,CtCLcc—CL:9CC,):03±cr)o0cc7<2±LUCtCDDiCDHCL<cici:B’<‘7DiCC9—rrCLCDCDcc3Ci9o-h.CLCDCDcc:Brcc’cn<7<‘7——hC)ICC,C)CDCL::Ccr”)’0CDCL)DCLCDCL.ciccCLCD: c; CD CDCL cci 3± H: CD:9 tflt’ B cc 3±0 0 3±, — Cl) CL $3 Di cc 0 o CL ci) Di 3: CC. — 9 fl. CL C) :3: o —: CD :33±C)z0CCHCD:3:“CLCi:3CL4:CDccCD:cc—:3:ciC)Hirt—H))CiCLccV<w::CLccDi:3<:3ci:3<1’CD:rri’CLCiciiC)).-0—rcc)C)—)C30CDCDC)(C)(3:><oci:CLCLCLCLCDCDC)ci’)CDHiccC”)DiC)CDozi<tCL-rB:CLCCLCLHirrCL<7cciQ)—CrCL(3ciU,B’H(3U,ciCDCi(39,:3.CCr)CC.cc(3c,U,2.cc::3:.Ci(2)(3.c:•’CD00CLCLCiCiC’)cciCL—BCLB.Bci(3CD::3“:7’—cc3::3CL-çcici:)BH4CDcc.cc:CoccH0::3CDHCL:10CLH:ciLuC)’)CL—:3::3cc0CD-‘CD-‘-‘9,4:CLciccci0ci)‘CLs,23(3.CL-t LU’) CL 9, —n B’ CL :3 CLCD)_rN) :r (j 3 CD CL (3 9‘t9.\7< ‘t 7< CD3±cDCDCD::3CLci:)-+:C 33 CLH:—0CD-‘CD-‘-‘9,ci)‘CL 0 rtCLCD-, s,23 (3. C1•333Cc:‘44)NrrN24NDr.•.22222212(1:Nm‘4;1))(131% 4 4 N 1—3- N- N- N ‘4 Cl 1) ‘2 22 - — ‘4 133333133N.32233L3)rtNCcEiN1-HC)241221:3333133N.32233L3)rtNCcEiN1-HC)241221:34-N--‘33(3mN-‘C.22221(3ZN21ZN32Cc21(1)((31))Cc(31N22::33-‘33(3mN-‘C.22221(3ZN21ZN32Cc21(1)((31))Cc(31N22::33 CcEi 3N S(13133113N(3(3(NCl(N 33< ‘C ‘44 :3 >1 ir - (13 t$ 3<t$ 311 32: :3 ‘C :3 ZIN 22 Dr 413 — 32. 32— 9Cc>’4Cc>’4 9Cc>’4Cc>’4 Cc c N 4;1 1> 4_’4 332 2-•• ‘- 44 (13. 24 (13 4- N (13 Ci. C) 22c N- (33 >1 35 N is 11 333 313 L Cc: 1133 Cr C) --- (3 NCr (3 3<.(3: 4- 0 04-()N:213<.123233(>•(33‘43 CcCc*1N- 333‘N 33330 Cl ‘41L04-a3isNNN-‘C:232.14-N12(>•‘43 35 333 cc 0 -- (N ZN 3333 131: N 35 o (24 1(3 N N 31) :3 0 :3C_44 (1) C) N
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan