Ita/32/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Trichur v. Shri. P.k.kannan, Wadakkanchery, Trichur
High Court
31 Jan 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/32/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Trichur v. Shri. P.k.kannan, Wadakkanchery, Trichur
Date of order
31 Jan 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Ita/32/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Trichur v. Shri. P.k.kannan, Wadakkanchery, Trichur, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY
MONDAY, THE 31ST JANUARY 2011 / 11TH MAGHA 1932
ITA.No. 32 of 2010()
--------------------
ITA.1004/COCH/2008 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT/RESPONDENT
----------------------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
THRISSUR.
BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT(S): APPELLANT
------------------------
SHRI. P.K.KANNAN,
PROP. VIJAYA CONSTRUCTIONS, WADAKKANCHERY,
THRISSUR DISTRICT.
ADV. SRI.TONY CHACKO
SRI.P.BALAKRISHNAN (E)
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 31/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
C .N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, &BHABANI PRASAD RAY, JJ.
--------------------------------------------
I. T. A. No. 32 of 2010
--------------------------------------------
Dated this the 31st day of January, 2011
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair, J.
During hearing of this appeal, both sides submitted that appealfiled by the revenue against the very same order of the CIT (Appeals) ispending before the Tribunal. Department as produced Annexure Dwhich is the grounds of appeal filed by the revenue in their appeal filedagainst the same order of the CIT (Appeals). It is also seen thatdepartment's case with reference to Section 194C(2) is not seenconsidered by the Tribunal while disposing of the assessee's appeal.We feel that Tribunal should reconsider this appeal along with theappeal filed by the revenue against the very same order of the CIT(Appeals). We therefore allow this appeal by setting aside the order ofthe Tribunal and restore the appeal filed by the assessee to the file ofthe Tribunal for being heard along with Annexure D grounds of appealfiled by the revenue. The Tribunal will consider both the appeals on
merits including applicability of Section 194C(2) and dispose of thesame.
(C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)Judge.
(BHABANI PRASAD RAY)
Judge.
kk
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.