Case LawHigh Court › Ita/322/2019 Of The Principal Commission...

Ita/322/2019 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Smt. Asha Menon (Asha Sunil)

High Court 09 Mar 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/322/2019 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Smt. Asha Menon (Asha Sunil)
Date of order
09 Mar 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/322/2019 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Smt. Asha Menon (Asha Sunil), the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI WEDNESDAY, THE 9 DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 18TH PHALGUNA, 1943 ITA NO.322 OF 2019 AGAINST THE ORDER IN ITA 596/Coch/2018 OF I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH Dated 30.04.2019 APPELLANT/Appellant/Revenue: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) KOCHI. BY ADVS. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SENIOR COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/Assessee: SMT. ASHA MENON (ASHA SUNIL) NO.13-B, LINK HORIZON, MARINE DRIVE, ERNAKULAM-682016. BY ADVS. SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR SRI.K.JOHN MATHAI SRI.JOSON MANAVALAN SRI.KURYAN THOMAS SRI.PAULOSE C. ABRAHAM OTHER PRESENT: ADV PARVATHI FOR THE RESPONDENT THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09.03.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Dated this the 9[th] day of March 2022 S.V.BHATTI, J. Appeal is at the instance of Revenue. The order dated 30.04.2019 in I.T.A. No.596/Coch/2018 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench, Cochin, is assailed. 2. Adv. Smt.Parvathi holding for Adv.Mr.M.Gopikrishnan Nambiar, on instructions received from the assessee, informs the Court that the assessee has availed the option to settle the dispute under 'Vivad Se Vishwas' scheme. 3. The Income Tax Appeal is dismissed as ineffective, for, the assessee, during the pendency of the appeal, has opted for the benefit provided under the 'Vivad Se Vishwas' scheme. The assessee/Revenue, as the case may be, is given liberty to file petition to recall the instant order in the event of not taking the request of the assessee to its logical end under the Scheme. SD/- S.V.BHATTI JUDGE SD/-BASANT BALAJI JUDGE PETITIONER ANNEXURES
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan