Ita/325/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Thrishur v. Abdul Rawuf, Raja Manzil, Chavakkad
High Court
18 Sep 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/325/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Thrishur v. Abdul Rawuf, Raja Manzil, Chavakkad
Date of order
18 Sep 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/325/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Thrishur v. Abdul Rawuf, Raja Manzil, Chavakkad, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Consequently the appeals are dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN
FRIDAY, THE 18TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 27TH BHADRA 1931
ITA.No. 325 of 2009()
---------------------
ITA.129/COCH/2004 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT/APPELLANT
---------------------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, THRISHUR
BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES)
SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT(S):
---------------
SHRI ABDUL RAWUF,
RAJA MANZIL, CHAVAKKAD.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ALONG WITH ITA NO.372/2009 ON 18/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WITH ITA NO.372/2009 ON 18/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &V.K.MOHANAN, JJ.
....................................................................I.T. Appeal Nos.325 & 372 of 2009
....................................................................Dated this the 18th day of September, 2009.
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair, J.
Since the Tribunal did not entertain the appeals filed by thedepartment for the reason that the tax amount involved is below thethreshold limit prescribed by CBDT for filing appeal by thedepartment, we do not think we should entertain appeals against suchorders. Consequently the appeals are dismissed.
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
Judge
pms
V.K.MOHANANJudge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue