Case LawHigh Court › Ita/333/2010 Of Commissioner Of Income T...

Ita/333/2010 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Shri Shiva S Karkera

High Court 02 Jun 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/333/2010 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Shri Shiva S Karkera
Date of order
02 Jun 2015
Assessment year(s)
2005-06
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/333/2010 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Shri Shiva S Karkera, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THER HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2 DAY OF JUNE 2015, ~PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE|ARAVIND KUMAR 1T.A. NO.333 OF 2010 BETWEHEN 1.|COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IIL CHRENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING QUEENS ROAD) BANGALORE — 560 O01. 2ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER. OBR INCOME TAX UDUPI RANGEUDUPL.UDUPL. .APPELLANTS (BY SRLE.SANMATHI INDRAKUMAR, STANDING ©COUNSEL] AN D SHRI.SHIVA S KARKERAPWD CONTRACTOR, KODI KANYANA, UDUPI RESPONDENT (BY SRLA.SHANKAR, ADV.) | THIS APPEAL IS FILBEID UNDER SECTION 260-A OLT.ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 26.04.2010|PASSEDIN|ITANO.419/BANG/2009,KOR,THE.ASSESSMENT YEAR 2005-06, WITH A PRAYER TO = ()FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW|STATED THEREIN Gai) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET|ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ITAT, “B’ BENCH,|BANGALORE IN ITA NO.419/BANG/2009 DATED 26.04.2010|IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR,HEARING“THIS DAYMOHAN M SHANTANAGOUDARK /.DELIVERED ‘THEFOLLOWING:- JUDGMENT It is brought to the notice of the court by the learned counsel for the appellants that the appeal has becomeinfructuous in view of the orders passed by the Assessing Officer after remand. Hence, the appeal standsdismissed as having become infructuous. However, the contentions raised|in this appeal are kept open to be urged in I.T.A.No.278/2014. SS. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan