Ita/334/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Jalandhar v. Deepak Mittal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA|AT CHANDIGARH 317-6 ITA No.334 of 2014 (O&M)Date of decision : 06.09.2019 Commissioner of Income Tax-lI, Jalandha ..... Appellant VerTSU Shri Deepak Mittal C/o Sonalika Agrl. Industries ...... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICEKE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICHARNARESH SINGH GILL Present :Mr. Vivek Sethi, Senior Standing counsel withMr. Varun Issar, Junior Standing counselfor the appellant. Mr. Akshay Bhan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Alok Mittal, Advocate andMr. Shantanu Bnasal, Advocatefor the respondent-Assesse, AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) 1]Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue states that sincethe tax effect involved is less than the monetary limit as prescribed inCircular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018 issued by the Central Board ofDirect Taxes, further amended vide Circular No.l7 of 2019 datedOS.O08.2019 read with Letter No.E.No.279/Misc/M-93/2018-ITJ dated20.08.2019, he has instructions to withdraw the present appeal. However,he prayed that liberty be granted to the appellant-revenue to file anapplication for revival of the appeal, in case something survives therein. 2 Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 3,Since the main case has been dismissed, the pending C.M., ifany, also stands disposed of. (AJAY TEWARITJUDGE 06.09.2019anuradha (HARNARESH SINGH GILL)JUDGE Whether speaking/reasonedWhether Reportable | Yes/No Yes/No