Case LawHigh Court › Ita/335/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/335/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula v. M/S Saraswati Industrial Syndicate Ltd

High Court 13 Sep 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Ita/335/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula v. M/S Saraswati Industrial Syndicate Ltd
Date of order
13 Sep 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/335/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula v. M/S Saraswati Industrial Syndicate Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: Whether speaking/reasoned?Yes2.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH. FSR S ITA No.335 of 2017 (O&M)Date of Decision: 13.09.2018 FSR S Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula...Appellant VS| M/s Saraswati Industrial Syndicate Ltd.... Respondent| KK O Coram: Hon’ble Mr.Justice Surya KantHon’ble Mr.Justice Sudip AhluwaliaHon’ble Mr.Justice Sudip Ahluwalia FE SE Present:Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocate for the appellant © Mr. Alok Mittal, Advocate for the respondent| FE SE SURYA KANT J. (Oral) ()*Learned counsel for Revenue states that the tax effect involved|in this case 1s)a26,67,/90/- and in view of the recent Circular No.3/2018dated 11.07.2018 issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department ofRevenue, Central Board Direct Taxes, a photocopy whereof is taken onrecord and is marked as Mark ‘A’, the tax effect being less thana50 lacs,he does not want to press this appeal on merits. (+*In view of the CBDT Circular, the instant appeal is dismissedas not pressed. As prayed for by learned counsel for the appellant, liberty isgranted to the Revenue to seek revival of the appeal, if need be, in thechanged circumstances. The question of law is also kept open. | 13.09.2018vishal shonkar 1. Whether speaking/reasoned?Yes2. Whether reportable? |NoV.Vishal2018.09.17 16:57I attest to the accuracy andintegrity of this document (Surya Kant)Judge (Sudip Ahluwalia)Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan