Case LawHigh Court › Ita/339/2018 Of Pr Commissioner Of Incom...

Ita/339/2018 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Smt Bhagya Nagraj

High Court 18 Oct 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/339/2018 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Smt Bhagya Nagraj
Date of order
18 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
2008-2009
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/339/2018 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Smt Bhagya Nagraj, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU|ON THE 18 DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 | BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGIL INCOME TAX APPEAL NO,.339 OF 201 BETWEEN‘ 1.|PR, COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXCENTRAL, QUEENS ROAD,BENGALURU. D> |THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TA«XCENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2),BENGALURU.CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2),BENGALURU. .. APPELLANTS (BY SRI JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, ADVOCATE) AND SMT. BHAGYA NAGRAJNO.6 AND 7, 5 CROSS,CHUNCHAGHATTA MAIN ROAD,|NEW BANK COLONY,KONANKUNTA, ~BENGALURU-560002. RESPONDENT| THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION|260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER)DATED 25.10.2017 PASSED IN ITA NO.96/BANG/2017, FOR|THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-2009, PRAYING TO DECIDE|THE FOREGOING QUESTION OF LAW AND / OR SUCH OTHER) QUESTIONS OF LAW AS MAY BE FORMULATED BY THE|HON BLE COURT AS DEEMED FIT AND SET ASIDE THE!APPELLATE ORDER DATED 25.10.2017 PASSED BY THE!INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, *C’ BENCH, BENGALURU|IN APPEAL PROCEEDINGS NO. ITA NO.96/BANG/2017 FOR)ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-2009, AS SOUGHT FOR IN THIS|APPEAL.- OK OK THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS|THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the appellants submits that the|appeal is not maintainable in view of the monetary limits in|terms of Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 passed by Director (ITJ), Central Board Direct Taxes, New Delhi. 2 |In view of the submission made, the appeal isadismissed as sucn. | Sd/-JUDGE Rsk/- Sd/- JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan