Case Law › High Court › Ita/339/2019 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of...

Ita/339/2019 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Gurgaon v. M/S Zaroopa Foods Pvt. Ltd

High Court 24 Feb 2020 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

24 Feb 2020

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/339/2019 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Gurgaon v. M/S Zaroopa Foods Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THK HIGH COURT QORKR PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH ITA No. 339 of 2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: 24.02.7020. The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Gurgaon ...... Appellant (!)$*$ Zaroopa Foods Pvt. Ltd. ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN Present:Mr. Tajender K. Joshi, Advocate| Senior Standing counselfor the appellant. AJAY TEWARI, J.(Oral) 1]Learned counsel for the appellant states that since the tax effectinvolved is less than the monetary limit as prescribed in Circular No.3 of 2018dated 11.7.2018 dated 22.08.2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes,further amended vide Circular No.17 of 2019 dated O8.08.2019 read withLetter No. F.No.279/Misc./M-93/2018-ITJ dated 22.08.2019, he hasinstructions to withdraw the present appeal. However, he prayed that liberty beeranted to the appellant-revenue to file an application for revival of the appeal,in case something survives therein. 2 Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for, 3]Since the main case has been dismissed as withdrawn, the pendingapplication, if any, also stands disposed of. (AJAY TEWARIT) JUDGE 24.02.2020reemM (AVNEESH JHINGAN) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.