Case LawHigh Court › Ita/34/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Incom...

Ita/34/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Hewlett Packard India Sales Pvt Ltd

High Court 05 Dec 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/34/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Hewlett Packard India Sales Pvt Ltd
Date of order
05 Dec 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/34/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Hewlett Packard India Sales Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FORORDERS THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH, J., DELIVERED|THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT In view of the memo dated 5-1-2015, the appeal IS dismissed as witndrawn.| SD/-JUDGE | SD/-|JUDGE kKVK

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU|ON THE 5 DAY OF DECEMBER, 2018 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH| AND| THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE K. NATARAJAN. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.34 OF 2006 BEI|WEE 1THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TA®™C.R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD,BENGALURU. 2 |THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONEROF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-11(2), C.R. BUILDING,QUEENS ROAD,BENGALURU. ... APPELLANTS (BY SRI K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE). AND M/S. HEWLETT PACKARD INDIA SALES PVT. LTD.(FORMERLY KNOWN ASM/S. COMPAQ COMPUTER (INDIA) PVT. LTD.)|SALARPURIA ARENA, HOSUR MAIN ROAD, ADUGODI,BENGALURU. ~., RESPONDENT THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL [IS FILED UNDERSECTION 260A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961,|PRAYING|TO.FORMULATETHE.SUBSTANTIALQUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN AND ALLOW|THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY.THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU,|IN|M.P.|NO.58/BANG/2005.IN|L.1 A.NO.396/BANG/2003 DATED 27-7-2005 AND SET ASIDETHE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER AND.CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ASSISTANT.COMMISSIONER.OF|INCOME.TAX,CIRCLE-11(2),BENGALURU. THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FORORDERS THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH, J., DELIVERED|THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT In view of the memo dated 5-1-2015, the appeal IS dismissed as witndrawn.| SD/-JUDGE | SD/-|JUDGE kKVK
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan