Ita/34/2014 Of M/S Tanvest Properties v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST 2014/21ST SRAVANA, 1936 ITA.No. 34 of 2014 () ---------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 214/COCH/2013 (2008-09) OFTHE I.T.A.TRIBUNAL, COCHIN BENCH DATED 23-08-2013 APPELLANT(S)/APPELLANT IN ITA: ---------------------------------------------- M/S. TANVEST PROPERTIES FLAT NO. 12 A, EXPRESS ESTATE, KALOOR KOCHI-682 017. BY ADVS.SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR SRI.P.GOPINATH SRI.P.BENNY THOMAS SRI.K.JOHN MATHAI SMT.A.PARVATHI MENON RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT IN ITA: ---------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, C R BUILDINGS, I S PRESS ROAD, ERNAKULAM KOCHI-682 018. BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX DEPT. THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSIONON 12-08-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THEFOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JJ. ....................................................................ITA No.34 of 2014 .................................................................... Dated this the 12[th] of August, 2014. J U D G M E N T Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J. The learned counsel for the appellant, rightly, points out that nothing survives in this appeal, in view of the fact that following theorder of remand, the jurisdictional ITO had passed consequentialorder, that too, in favour of the appellant. Under suchcircumstances, this appeal is dismissed as infructuous, withoutanswering the questions raised. (THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE) jg (P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE)