Ita/351/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income- Tax v. M/S. Bangalore Commercial Transport
High Court
27 Jun 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/351/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income- Tax v. M/S. Bangalore Commercial Transport
Date of order
27 Jun 2014
Assessment year(s)
2007-08
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/351/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income- Tax v. M/S. Bangalore Commercial Transport, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 27 DAY OF JUNE, 2014
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N KUMAR
ANTI
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B MANOHAR|
ITA No. 351/201
BETWEEN:
Ll.Commissioner ot Income Jax ©
C. R. Building,
Queens Road,
Bangalore.
iaThe Assistant Commissioner ofIncome TaxIncome Tax
Circle — 3(1),
C.R.Building,
Queens Road,
Bangalore.
. Appellants
(By Sri G. Kamaladhar, Adv.)
AND:
M/s. Bangalore Commercial Transport CreditCo-operative Society LimitedNo.21, 1[St]Cross,
o
Chikkanna Garden,
Chamrajpet,Bangalore 560 018. |
...Respondent
(By Sri A. Shankar & Sri M. Lava, Advs.)
KREEKKRERERRE
This ITA filed under Section 260-A of I.T. Act, 1961.arising out of order dated 08.04.2011 passed in ITANo.1069/Bang/2010, tor the Assessment year 2007-08,praying to (i) formulate the substantial questions of lawstated therein; (11) allow the appeal and set aside the orderspassed by the ITAT, Bangalore in ITA No.10609/Bang/2010dated 08.04.2011 confirming the order of the AppellateCommissioner and confirm the order passed by the AssistantCommissioner of Income Tax, Circle-3(1), Bangalore.|
This ITA coming on for hearing this day,N. KUMAR Jdelivered the following:
JU DBiGMENT
Thisappeal1S|preferredbythe.TEVETLUE
challenging the order passed by the Tribunal, wherein it
is held that sub-section (4) of Section 80P of the Income
Tax Act, 1961 is applicable only to co-operative banks.and not to credit co-operative societies.
OoThe substantial questions of law which are|
raised in the appeal are as under:
3
(1) Whether the Tribunal was correct inholding that the provision of sub-section (4)oft Section SOP ot the Income Tax Act areapplicable only to co-operative Banks andnot to credit Co-operative Societies, whichaTe€engaged|1nbusiness|oT|banking,including providing credit facilities to theirmembers?|
(11)Whether the tribunal was correct inholding that the assessee is a co-operativesociety and not a co-operative Bank in terms—of sub-section (4) of section 8OP of theIncome Tax Act without considering themeaning of co-operative Bank as envisagedunder part V of Banking Regulation Act,1949 wherein it is defined that co-operative|Bank includes primary co-operative Bank,which is further defined as co-operative|societywiththeprimaryobjectoT|transactions of Banking businessP”
v
3.|The Tribunal in its order has set out the'difference between the co-operative bank and society asunder:
5
a |This Court had an occasion to consider the|
said question inITA No.5006/2013' dated05.02.2014
;
in the case oftTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXvs. SRI BILURU GURUBASAVA PATTINA SAHAKARISANGHANIYAMITHA,BAGALKOT,where,afterreferring to the relevant provisions of the Income TaxAct, and the banking Regulation Act, held as under:
“Tt.aCo-operative Bank|1Sexclusivelycarrying banking business, then the incomederived from the said business cannot be!deducted in computing the total income ofthe assessee. The said income is liable for!tax. A Co-operative bank as defined under|the Banking Regulation Act includes theprimary agricultural credit society or aprimaryco-operativeagricultural ruraldevelopment bank. The Legislature did notwant to deny the said benefit to a primaryagricultural credit society or a primary co-operative agricultural and rural developmentbank. They did not want to extend the saidbenefit to a co-operative bank which is|exclusively carrying on banking business
“Tt.aCo-operative Bank|1Sexclusivelycarrying banking business, then the incomederived from the said business cannot be!deducted in computing the total income ofthe assessee. The said income is liable for!tax. A Co-operative bank as defined under|the Banking Regulation Act includes theprimary agricultural credit society or aprimaryco-operativeagricultural ruraldevelopment bank. The Legislature did notwant to deny the said benefit to a primaryagricultural credit society or a primary co-operative agricultural and rural developmentbank. They did not want to extend the saidbenefit to a co-operative bank which is|exclusively carrying on banking business
l.e., the purport of the amendment. If theassessee 1S not a Co-operative bank carryingon exclusively banking business and if itdoes not possess a license from the ReserveBank of India to carry on business, then it isnot a Co-operative bank. It is a Co-operativesociety which also carries on the business oflending money to its members which iscovered under|Section|SOP(2)(a)(i) 1.€.,.carrying on the business of banking forproviding credit facilitates to its members.The object of the aforesaid amendment is notto exclude the benefit extended umndersection 8OP(i) to the society.” |
Therefore, the said issue was held in favour of theassessee and against the revenue.
5.|The said judgment answers the issues inthis case also. Accordingly, we pass the following order.
<
�-!�%33!%)����*������!*���-!��(?�.% .�%)�@(!�.�� ���#�)%A�%"!�% �A!"!*�� �#%5�("��#�.-!�%��!��!!�% *�%+%� �.�.-!�"!5! (!���
%�&�'(���& ��
%�&�'(���*���
F��4�
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.