Case LawHigh Court › Ita/35/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Incom...

Ita/35/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Texas Instruments (India) Pvt Ltd

High Court 02 Feb 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/35/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Texas Instruments (India) Pvt Ltd
Date of order
02 Feb 2021
Assessment year(s)
2005-06
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/35/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Texas Instruments (India) Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the assessee to revivethe same if occasion so arises.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE J2JND DAY OF FEBRUARY 270PRESENT| THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND| THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASW AMYLT.A. NO.35 OF 2012 BETWEEN: 1.|THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX LTU, JSS TOWERS, BASK III STAGE BANGALORE. 2.|THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX LTU, JSS TOWERS, BSK III STAGE. BANGALORE. (BY MR. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.,) _... APPELLANTS AND* M/S. TEXAS INSTRUMENTS (INDIA) PVT. LTD., 66/3, BAGMANE TECH PARK.BYRASANDRA, C.V. RAMAN NAGAR POST|BANGALORE-560093. (BY MS. MAHIMA GOUD, ADV.,). .., RESPONDENT THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SEC. J6O0-A OF INCOME TAXACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 29.09.2011 PASSEDIN ITA NO.1358/BANG/2010 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2005-06, PRAYING TO: | (i) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW,STATED THEREIN. |(ii) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED.29.09.2011.PASSEDBY|THE|LIAT,BANGALOREIN| ITANO.1358/BANG/2010CONFIRMINGTHE|ORDEROF.THEAPPELLATE COMMISSIONER AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED.BYTHE.DEPUTY.COMMISSIONEROF.INCOME|TAX,|LIU,BANGALORE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS|I.7T.A. COMING ONFORORDERS,THISDAY,ALOK ARADHE J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: | JUDGMENT Mr.Dilip Kumar, learned counsel for Mr.K.V.Aravind,|learned counsel for the revenue. Smt.Mahima Goud, learned counsel for the assessee. Learned counsel for the assessee has filed a memo'seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal. Theaforesaid memo is taken on record. 2. For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the assessee to revivethe same if occasion so arises. Sd/-JUDGE RV Sd/-—JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan