Ita/353/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax Patiala v. M/S Aggarwal Steel Rolling Mills & Metal Industries
High Court
31 Oct 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Ita/353/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax Patiala v. M/S Aggarwal Steel Rolling Mills & Metal Industries
Date of order
31 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/353/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax Patiala v. M/S Aggarwal Steel Rolling Mills & Metal Industries, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
997IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH
ITA No.353 of 2013 (O&M)Date of decision : 31.10.2019
Commissioner of Income Tax Patiala
...... Appellant
VerTSU
M/s Aggarwal Steel Rolling Mills & MetalIndustries
...... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWART
HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICEALKA SARIN
///
Present :Ms. Pridhi Jaswinder Sandhu, Advocate forMr. Kunal Sharma, Advocatefor the appellant.
None for the respondent.
///
AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral)
inLearned counsel for the appellant-revenue states that sincethe tax effect involved is less than the monetary limit as prescribed inCircular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018 issued by the Central Board ofDirect Taxes, further amended vide Circular No.l7 of 2019 datedOS.O08.2019 read with Letter No.E.No.279/Misc/M-93/2018-ITJ dated20.08.2019, he has instructions to withdraw the present appeal. However,he prayed that liberty be granted to the appellant-revenue to file anapplication for revival of the appeal, in case something survives therein.2 Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
3,Since the main case has been dismissed, the pending C.M.Application, if any, also stands disposed of. |
(AJAY TEWARITJUDGE
31.10.2019pooja sharma-l
Whether speaking/reasonedWhether Reportable |
( ALKA SARINJUDGE
Yes/NoYes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.