Ita/355/2014 Of Sri G Balraj v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
28 Sep 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/355/2014 Of Sri G Balraj v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
28 Sep 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/355/2014 Of Sri G Balraj v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Decision: Appeal is disposed of as. withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU|
DATED THIS THE 28 DAY OF SHKPIEMBER 20106
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL.
AND.
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR|
ITA NO.359/2014
BETWEEN:
SRI. G. BALRAdY»/O SRI GOVINDASWAMYAGED ABOUT 60 YRBRAR
NO.6-112-81,NBTRAVATHI NAGAR LAYOUT|NAGORI, KANKANADYMANGALORE-5 7/5007
_ APPELLANT
(BY SRI.CHYTHANYA K K, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THER ASSISTANT COMMISSIONBROF INCOME TAX.
RANGE-1, C.R.BUILDINGATTAVARA, N.G.ROAD|MANGALORE -575 OO1.
~ RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.E.L.SANMATHI, ADVOCATE)
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A OF|THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO FORMULATESUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE ANDALLOW THR APPEAL AND SEI ASIDE THE I[MPUGNED
2
ORDER (TO THE EXTENT PREJUDICIAL) OF THE INCOMETAX|APPELLA IETRIBUNALBEARINGITANOS. 594(BNG)/2010 DATED 04.01.2011 ON THE VALIDITY OF THEASSHKSSMENT FOR THE YEAR 2007-08.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY,JAYANTH PATEL J,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING :
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel appearing for the appellant has
tendered a memo of withdrawal of the appeal.
Permission is granted. Appeal is disposed of as.
withdrawn.
SD/-|
JUDGE
SD/-
JUDGE
1)|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue