Ita/360/2013 Of Late Sri L Sohanraj v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
29 Mar 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/360/2013 Of Late Sri L Sohanraj v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
29 Mar 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/360/2013 Of Late Sri L Sohanraj v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn witnliberty to the assessee to revive the same if occasion so|arises.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE JZ9OTH DAY OF MARCH 20
PRESENT|
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND|
THE HON’/BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL
1T.A. NO.360 OF 2013BETWEEN:
LATE SRI. L. SOHANRAJ)REP. BY LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES|SRI. S. NEMICHAND|SRI. S. BHARATRAJ &SRI. S. SAJJANRAJ #34, MAMULPET, BANGALORE-560053.
(BY MR. M. LAVA, ADV.,)
— ADPELLANT
AND"
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCIRCLE 1(1), H.M.T. BHAVAN#99, BELLARY ROAD, GANGENHALLIBANGALORE-560032.
.., RESPONDENT
(BY MR. DILEEP KUMAR, ADV., FOR)MR. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.,) |
THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SEC. J6O0-A OF INCOME TAXACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 15.03.2013 PASSEDIN ITA NO.355/BANG/2012 AND C.0.74/BANG/2012 FOR THEASSESSMENT YEAR 1994-95, PRAYING TO:
(i) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW,STATED THEREIN. |
(ii) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER.PASSEDBY|THEITAT,"B'|BENCH,|BANGALORE.TN|TTANO.355/BANG/2012 AND C.O0.74/BANG/2012 DATED 15.03.2013.
THIS I.7T.A. COMING ON FOR’ HEARING, THIS’ DAY, |ALOK ARADHE J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: |
JUDGMENT
Mr.M.Lava, learned counsel for the assessee.
Mr.Dilip Kumar, learned counsel for Mr.K.V.Aravind,|learned counsel for the revenue.
Learned counsel for the assessee has filed a memo'seeking leave of this Court to witndraw the appeal on theground that the dispute has been amicably settled underVivad se Vishwas scheme. The aforesaid memo is taken on|record.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn witnliberty to the assessee to revive the same if occasion so|arises.
Sd/-—JUDGE
RV|
Sd/-JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.