Ita/36/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri V Rajendra Naidu
High Court
20 Jun 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/36/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri V Rajendra Naidu
Date of order
20 Jun 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/36/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri V Rajendra Naidu, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THB HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALOREDATED THIS THE 20[th]DAY OF JUNE 2014
PRESENT
THR HON BLE MR. JUSTICE N. KUMAR.
AND
THR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICK B. MANOHAR|
ITA No.36 OF 2008
BETWEEN;
1.The Commissioner of Income-Tax,Central Circle, C.R.Building,Queens Road, Bangalore.
2 The Asst. Commissioner ofIncome-Tax, Central Circle-1(4) |C.R.Building, Queens Road,Bangalore... APPELLANTS
(By Sri G Kamaladhar, Advocate)
AND:
sri V Rajendra Naidu (HUF)No.42, 0[th]Cross, 3[)2]MainBanashankari II StageBangalore... RESPONDENT
(By Sri Ashok A Kulkarni tor M/s.K R Prasad, Advocate)
-0-0-0-0-O0-
This ITA is filed under Section 260-A of I.T. Act,|1961 arising out of Order dated 24.8.2007 passed inIT(SS)A.No.31/Bang/2006 & C.O.No.76/Bang/2007 inIT(SS)A No.381/Bang/2006 for the Block AssessmentPeriod1.4.1990|TO23.8.2000TO formulate.thesubstantial questions of law stated therein and to allowthe appeal and set aside the order passed by the ITAT,Bangalore|1n IT(SS)A.No.31/Bang/2006.&|C.O.No./76/Bang/2007 in IT(SS)/A No.31/Bang/200dated 24.8.2007 confirming the order of the AppellateCommissioner and confirm the order passed by theAssistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central circle —1(4), Bangalore.
This appeal coming on for hearing this day,N.,KUMAR, J.delivered the following:-
JUDGMENT
TheTEVENUEhas preferred|this|appealchallenging the order passed by the Tribunal.
2. The net tax effect of Rs.20,681/- which is thesubjectmatterot|thisappeal,1S lessthan Rs.4,00,000 /-aS|prescribedunderInstructionNo.2/2005. Hence, the appeal is not maintainable. ©
3.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed onthe ground that the net tax effect is less thanRs.4,00,000/-, without pronouncing any opinion onthe merits of the case. —
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-|
JUDGE
*alb/-.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.