Case Law › High Court › Ita/36/2010 Of Vinod Kumar Singh v. Astt...

Ita/36/2010 Of Vinod Kumar Singh v. Astt. Commissioner Of Income Tax 2 (1)

High Court 03 Jul 2023 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · mphc_db_jbp

Parties

Date of order

03 Jul 2023

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Ita/36/2010 Of Vinod Kumar Singh v. Astt. Commissioner Of Income Tax 2 (1), the High Court (2023) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, this appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT JABALPURBEFOREHON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AVANINDRA KUMAR SINGHON THE 3[rd] OF JULY, 2023 INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 36 of 2010 BETWEEN:- VINOD KUMAR SINGH PLOT NO. 162, ASHIRWADCOMPLEX ZONE 1 M.P. NAGAR BHOPAL (MADHYAPRADESH) (BY SHRI MUKESH AGRAWAL - ADVOCATE ) .....PETITIONER AND ASTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 (1) AAYAKARBHAWAN HOSHANGABAD ROAD BHOPAL (MADHYAPRADESH) (BY SHRI ROHIT RAGHUVANSHI - ADVOCATE ) .....RESPONDENT This appeal coming on for orders this day, JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU passed the following: ORDER I.A. No.9071/2023 filed by the appellant for withdrawal of this appeal, is taken up, considered and allowed for the reasons mentioned therein. Accordingly, this appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. (SHEEL NAGU)JUDGE Sateesh (AVANINDRA KUMAR SINGH)JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.