Ita/36/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti, Niranjanpur, Dehradun
High Court
04 Aug 2020 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · ukhcucis_pg
Parties
Ita/36/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti, Niranjanpur, Dehradun
Date of order
04 Aug 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/36/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti, Niranjanpur, Dehradun, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND ATNAINITALINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 36 of 2012Commissioner of Income Tax, Dehradun. .....Appellant.
Vs.
M/s Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti, Niranjanpur, Dehradun. ...Respondent
Shri Hari Mohan Bhatia, learned counsel for the appellant.
Dated: 04.08.2020
Coram:Hon’ble Ravi Malimath, ACJ. Hon’ble N.S. Dhanik, J.
Ravi Malimath, ACJ. (Oral)
Shri Hari Mohan Bhatia, learned counsel for the appellant, submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this Appeal with a liberty to raise the substantial questions of law, raised in the present Appeal, in an appropriate proceeding at an appropriate stage.
2. In view of the submission made, the same is accepted. The Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to raise the substantial questions of law, raised in the present Appeal, in an appropriate proceeding at an appropriate stage.
3. The Application for Withdrawal (CLMANo. 15354 of 2019) also stands disposed-off.
(N.S. Dhanik, J.) (Ravi Malimath, ACJ.) 04.08.2020 04.08.2020
PSR
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.