Ita/36/2019 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Shimla v. M/S H.p. Housing And Urban Development Authority (Himuda)
High Court
25 Jul 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
Ita/36/2019 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Shimla v. M/S H.p. Housing And Urban Development Authority (Himuda)
Date of order
25 Jul 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/36/2019 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Shimla v. M/S H.p. Housing And Urban Development Authority (Himuda), the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
ON THE 25[th] DAY OF JULY, 2022
BEFORE
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SABINA&
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SATYEN VAIDYA
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 36 OF 2019
Between:-PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXSHIMLA.
….APPELLANT
(MR. VINAY KUTHIALA, SR. ADVOCATE WITH MS. VANDANA KUTHIALA, ADVOCATE)
AND
M/S H.P. HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTORITY, (HIMUDA), NIGAM VIHAR, SHIMLA.
....RESPONDENT
(SH. VISHAL MOHAN, PRAVEEN SHARMA & MS. SAMEEKSHA GUPTA, ADVOCATE).
This appeal coming on for hearing this day, Hon’ble
Ms. Justice Sabina, passed the following:
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that she
may be permitted to withdraw the appeal, on account of low tax
effect.
Ordered accordingly.
(Sabina)
Judge
25[th] July 2022 (kck)
(Satyen Vaidya)Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue