Ita/363/2015 Of Late Shri K B Khaleel v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
26 Oct 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/363/2015 Of Late Shri K B Khaleel v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
26 Oct 2021
Assessment year(s)
2004-05
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/363/2015 Of Late Shri K B Khaleel v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn in terms of the memo.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 26 DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE E. S. INDIRESH I.T.A. NO.363/2015
BETWEEN:
LATE SHRI K B KHALEEL REP. BY L/R SMT. FAHIMIDA KHATOON PROP.MUBARAK RICE MILL HARANGI OFFICE ROAD KONANUR ARAKALGUD Taluk HASSAN DISTRICT.
(BY SRI A SHANKAR, SENIOR COUNSEL A/W SRI BHAIRAV KUTTAIAH, ADVOCATE)
…APPELLANT
AND:
INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-II AAYKAR BHAVAN BELUR ROAD HASSAN-573 217.
(BY SRI K V ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
… RESPONDENT
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 05.03.2015 PASSED IN ITA NOS. 239 & 240/Bang/2011, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2004-05 & 2005-06. PRAYING THIS HON'BLE COURT TO 1. TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AS
STATED ABOVE AND ANSWER THE SAME IN FAVOUR OF THE APPELLANT. 2. TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE FINDINGS TO THE EXTENT AGAINST THE APPELLANT IN THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ITAT, BANGALORE 'A' BENCH IN ITA NOS. 239 & 240/Bang/2011 RELATING TO ASSESSMENT YEARS 2004-05 & 2005-06 VIDE ITS COMMON ORDER DATED 05/03/2015.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, S. SUJATHA J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the assessee has filed a memo dated 26.10.2021 for withdrawal of the appeal relating to the Assessment Years 2004-05 and 2005-
06. The said memo reads as under:
1. “The above named appellant has filed Income Tax Appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench for the Assessment Years 2004-05 and 2005-06. Tax Appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench for the Assessment Years 2004-05 and 2005-06.
2.The Appellant filed Form-1 and Form-2 for declaration and undertaking for paying taxes on disputed income under the scheme named The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 for the Assessment Years 2004-05 and 2005-06. declaration and undertaking for paying taxes on disputed income under the scheme named The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 for the Assessment Years 2004-05 and 2005-06.
3.Thereafter, the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Bengaluru-3 issued Form-3 certificate under sub-section (1) of Section 5 of Income Tax, Bengaluru-3 issued Form-3 certificate under sub-section (1) of Section 5 of
the Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Act, 2020 dated 04.09.2021, after verifying Form-1 and Form-2. Copy of the Form-3 is enclosed herewith for the Hon’ble Court’s reference and records.
4.Wherefore, in view of the above submissions
the Appellant humbly prays this Hon’ble Court may pleased to permit the Appellant to withdraw the above Income Tax Appeal with liberty to revive, in case, if the dispute is not settled under the scheme the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 in the interest of justice and equity.”
Memo is placed on record.
Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn in terms of the memo.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
SB
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.