Ita/364/2019 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Tds)-1 v. M/S Punjab State Cooperative Supply And Marketing Federation Ltd
High Court
05 Dec 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Ita/364/2019 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Tds)-1 v. M/S Punjab State Cooperative Supply And Marketing Federation Ltd
Date of order
05 Dec 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/364/2019 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Tds)-1 v. M/S Punjab State Cooperative Supply And Marketing Federation Ltd, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1113/3IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA|AT CHANDIGARH
ITA-364-2019(0&M)Date of decision :°05.12.2019
The Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS)-1, Chandigarh
Ve TSus
...... Appellant:
M/s Punjab State Cooperative Supply & Marketing Federation Ltd.
...... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICEK AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK PURI
Present :Mr. Denesh Goyal, Senior Standing Counsel for the appellant,333
AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral)
inAt the outset, |earned counsel for the appellant-revenue statesthat since the tax effect involved is less than the monetary limit as prescribedin Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018 issued by the Central Board ofDirect Taxes, further amended vide Circular No.l7 of 2019 datedO8O8.2019 read with Letter No.K.No.279/Misc/M-93/2018-ITJ dated20.08.2019, he has instructions to withdraw the present appeal. However, heprayed that liberty be granted to the appellant-revenue to file an applicationfor revival of the appeal, in case something survives therein.
|Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.|3Since the main case has been dismissed as withdrawn, thepending C.M., if any also stands disposed of.
05.12.2019Janki
(AJAY TEWARIT)
JUDGE(VIVEK PURI)
(VIVEK PURI)JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned
Yes/NoYes/No
Whether Reportable :
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.