Case LawHigh Court › Ita/370/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/370/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Calicut v. Catholic Diocess Of Bathery , Waynad

High Court 08 Nov 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/370/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Calicut v. Catholic Diocess Of Bathery , Waynad
Date of order
08 Nov 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/370/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Calicut v. Catholic Diocess Of Bathery , Waynad, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: The question raised is whether an institution with charity andreligion as objects is entitled to income-tax exemption.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY MONDAY, THE 8TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 17TH KARTHIKA 1932 ITA.No. 370 of 2010() --------------------- (AGAINST ORDER IN ITA 496/COCH/2007 OF ITAT, COCHIN BENCHCOCHIN) APPELLANT/RESPONDENT ---------------------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CALICUT. BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT(S): APPELLANT ------------------------ CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF BATHERY, WYANAD. THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/11/2010, ALONG WITH ITA 373/2010 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C .N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, &BHABANI PRASAD RAY, JJ. -------------------------------------------- I.T.A. Nos. 370 & 373 of 2010 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of November, 2010 JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. The question raised is whether an institution with charity andreligion as objects is entitled to income-tax exemption. We have takenthe view that if charitable and religious purposes independently enjoyincome tax exemption, those with combination of objects are alsoentitled to exemption. The said decision is taken in I.T.A.Nos. 116 of2010 and connected cases. Since the issue raised in these two appealsis also the same, following the judgment above referred, we dismissthese two appeals filed by the revenue. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)Judge. (BHABANI PRASAD RAY) Judge. kk kk
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan