Case LawHigh Court › Ita/370/2013 Of Nike India Private Limit...

Ita/370/2013 Of Nike India Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 05 Mar 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/370/2013 Of Nike India Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
05 Mar 2025
Assessment year(s)
2005-06, 2006-07
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Ita/370/2013 Of Nike India Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Digitally signedby SHAKAMBARILocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA C/W ITA No. 369 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5 DAY OF MARCH, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 370 OF 2013 C/WINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 369 OF 2013 IN ITA No. 370/2013 BETWEEN: NIKE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED NO.701, THE MILLENIA, TOWER-B, MURPHY ROAD, ULSOOR, BANGALORE-560 008 …APPELLANT (BY SMT. TANMAYEE RAJKUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-12(2), BANGALORE 14/3, RASHTROTHANA BHAVAN, 5 FLOOR, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, OPPOSITE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, BANGALORE-560 001 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. M. DILIP & SRI. Y.V. RAVIRAJ, ADVOCATES) THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SEC.260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 10/05/2013 PASSED IN IT(TP)A NO.653/BANG/2011, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2005-06, ANNEXURE - A PRAYING TO I. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN. IN ITA NO. 369/2013 BETWEEN: NIKE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED NO.701, THE MILLENIA, TOWER-B, MURPHY ROAD, ULSOOR, BANGALORE-560 008. (BY SMT. TANMAYEE RAJKUMAR, ADVOCATE) ...APPELLANT AND: DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-12(2), BANGALORE 14/3, RASHTROTHANA BHAVAN, 5 FLOOR, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, OPPOSITE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, BANGALORE-560 001 ...RESPONDENT (BY SRI. M. DILIP & SRI. Y.V. RAVIRAJ, ADVOCATES) THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SEC.260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 10/05/2013 PASSED IN IT(TP)A NO.654/BANG/2011, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07, ANNEXURE - A PRAYING TO I. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN, THESE APPEALS, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: NC: 2025:KHC:9315-DB C/W ITA No. 369 of 2013 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT AND HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT) Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo dated 28.02.2025 seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeals. Memo reads as under: "The Advocate for the Appellant submits that the above appeal was filed challenging the order dated 10.05.2013 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in IT(TP)A No.654/Bang/2011 for the assessment year 2006-07. It is submitted that the Appellant wishes to resolve the dispute under the provisions of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 ("the Scheme") and in this regard has filed the relevant declaration in Form-1. Pursuant to the declaration filed by the Appellant, the Income-tax Department has issued Form-2 under the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024. A true copy of the Form-2 dated 14.02.2025 is produced herewith and marked as Annexure-A. The Appellant seeks to withdraw the above appeal with the liberty to seek restoration of the appeal in the event that the application under the Scheme does not proceed or attain finality. Wherefore, it is most humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to take the memo together with the annexure on record and permit the Appellant to withdraw above appeal, in the interests of justice and equity". 2. There is no objection from the Panel Counsel appearing for the Revenue to grant leave to withdraw the appeals. 3. In view of the above, appeals are disposed off as having been withdrawn, in terms of the memo. Cost made easy. Sd/- (KRISHNA S DIXIT) JUDGE Sd/- (RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR) JUDGE DH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1 CT:SNN
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan