Ita/371/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The Secretary
High Court
02 Nov 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/371/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The Secretary
Date of order
02 Nov 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/371/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The Secretary, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Decision: All appeals shall stand disposed of accordingly.| JT/-| Sd/-.JUDGE| Sd/-.JUDGE|
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2 DAY OK NOVEMBER 20160.
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL
ANT)
THR HON’BLE MR.JUSTICK ARAVIND KUMAR|
ITA NO.371/2011
C/W
ITA NOS.372/2011 & 1770/2012C/WITA NO.373/2011
IN ITA NO.371/2011:BETWEEN
1.THEB COMMISSIONER OF [INCOME-TAPARK VIEW BUILDING,PJ EXTENSION,DAVANAGE RE.
. THR INCOME-TAX OFFICER |
WARD -1,BBRTAGERI BUILDINGHIGH SCHOOL ROADHAVERI-581 110. |
_. APPBLLANTS|
(BY SRI DILIP FOR SRI K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATES)
AND:
THR SHCRBETARY
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKETING COMMITTEE, APMC YARDBYADGI..
_. RESPONDENT.
(BY SRI MALLIKARJUN C BASAREDDY, ADVOCATE)
THIS ITA IS FILED U/S.2600-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 31-05-2011 PASSED IN|ITA NO.491/BANG/2010, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR)2004-2005, PRAYINGTOFORMULATETHE,SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN|AND ALLOW THR APPBAL AND SBT ASIDE THERE ORDEPASSEDBY.THE|ITAT,BANGALORE.LN|ITANO.491/BANG/2010 DATED 31-09-2011 AND CONFIRM)THE ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,|HAVERI, BANGALORE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE|AND EQUITY. |
ITA NO.372/2011 & ITA NO.170/2012;BETWEEN:
1.THEB COMMISSIONER OF [INCOME-TAPARK VIEW BUILDING,PJ EXTENSION,DAVANAGERE ~
2 THER INCOMEBE-TAX OFFICEWARD-1, BETAGERI BUILDING
HIGH SCHOOL ROADHAVERI-581 110. |
_. APPBLLANTS|
(BY SRI DILIP FOR SRI K V ARAVIND, ADVOCATES)
AND:
THR SKHCREBE TAGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKETING COMMITTEE, APMC YARDBYADGI..
... RESPONDENT.
(BY SRI MALLIKARJUN C BASAREDDY, ADVOCATE)|
THESE ITA’S ARE FILED U/S.260-A OF I.T.ACT,.1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATBD 31-05-2011|PASSEDIN|TTA.NO.492 /BANG/2010,FOR,THBRASSKSSMENTYRAR.2005-2006, PRAYINGTO|FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW|STATKHD THRRBIN AND ALLOW THR APPBAL AND SETASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ITAT, BANGALORE|IN ITA NO.492/BANG/2010 DATED 31-09-2011 ANDCONFIRM THR ORDBR PASSBED BY THR INCOMB TAXOFFICER, HAVERI, BANGALORE, IN THE INTEREST OF|JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
ITA NO.373/2011:BETWEEN:
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF [INCOME-TAXPARK VIEW BUILDING,PJ EXTENSION,DAVANAGERE ~
2 THER INCOMEBE-TAX OFFICE
WARD-1, BETAGERI BUILDINGHIGH SCHOOL ROADHAVERI-581 110. |
_. APPBLLANTS|
(BY SRI DILIP FOR SRI K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATES)
AND:
THR SHCRBETARY
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKETING COMMITTEE,|APMC YARDBYADGI..
... RESPONDENT.
(BY SRI MALLIKARJUN C BASAREDDY, ADVOCATE)
THIS ITA IS FILED U/S.260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961.ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 31-05-2011 PASSED IN|ITA NO.493/BANG/2010, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR|2006-07, PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL|QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN AND ALLOW THEAPPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSEBD BY THEITAT, BANGALORE IN ITA NO.493/BANG/2010 DATED)31.05.2011 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE)INCOME TAX OFFICER, HAVERI, BANGALORE, IN THE|INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. |
THRSK APPKBALS COMING ON FOR HBARING THISDAY,JAYANT PATEL J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
When we have taken up the matter for hearing,Mr.Dilip for Mr.K.V.Aravind, learned Counsel for theappellants-Revenue states that as the subject involved1n the.appealoT|taxable.liability1S.lessthanRs.20,00,000/-, as per the Circular dated 10.12.2015.issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (hereinaiterreferred to as ‘the Board’ for short), he does not pressthe present appeals. |
2. Hence, all the appeals are disposed of as notpressed in view of the Circular dated 10.12.2015 of theBoard.
3. All appeals shall stand disposed of accordingly.|
JT/-|
Sd/-.JUDGE|
Sd/-.JUDGE|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.