Case LawHigh Court › Ita/372/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/372/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Idea Cellular Ltd

High Court 24 Oct 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/372/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Idea Cellular Ltd
Date of order
24 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
2012-2013
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/372/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Idea Cellular Ltd, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU|ON THE 27 DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 | BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGIL INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3/72 OF 201 BETWEEN‘ 1.|THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX.TDS, NO.59, HMT BHAVAN,4 FLOOR, BALLARI ROAD,|GANGANAGAR,BENGALURU-560 032..TDS, NO.59, HMT BHAVAN,4 FLOOR, BALLARI ROAD,|GANGANAGAR,BENGALURU-560 032.. 2.|THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME-TAX (TDS)CIRCLE-18(1), NO.59, HMT BHAVAN,4 FLOOR, BALLARI ROAD,|GANGANAGAR,BENGALURU-560 032.)INCOME-TAX (TDS)CIRCLE-18(1), NO.59, HMT BHAVAN,4 FLOOR, BALLARI ROAD,|GANGANAGAR,BENGALURU-560 032.) .. APPELLANTS (BY SRI K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) AND M/S. IDEA CELLULAR LIMITEDIDEA TOWER, 75, CIVIL STATION,RICHMOND ROAD,BENGALURU-560 QOZ25 (BY SRI CHYTHANYA K.K., ADVOCATE ANDSRI S. SHARATH, ADVOCATE)SRI S. SHARATH, ADVOCATE) RESPONDENT| THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION|260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER|DATED 06.11.2015 PASSED IN ITA NO.651/BANG/2014, FOR|THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-2013, PRAYING THIS HON'BLE|COURT TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF|LAW STATED ABOVE; ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET-ASIDE|THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE ITAT, BENGALURU IN ITA)NO.651/BANG/2014 DATED 06.11.2015 AND CONFIRM THE|ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER CONFIRMING THEORDER PASSED BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF.INCOME TAX (TDS), CIRCLE-18(1), BENGALURU, ETC.| OK AK THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL|HEARING THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THE!FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Tne learned counsel for the appellants submit that the|appeal is not maintainable in view of the monetary limits in terms of Circular No.17 of 2019, dated 08.08.2019, passed by Director (ITJ), Central Board Direct Taxes, New Delhi. 2.|In view of the submission made, the appeal is—adismissed as sucn. | Sd/- JUDGE JJ Sd/- JUDGE |
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan